Monthly Archives: July 2013

Canis Lupus LLC Awards $100,000 Technology Grant to SIU Dosimetry Program

Posted on

In the past few years, I’ve developed closer collaborations with the dosimetry community, giving annual talks at the national AAMD meeting and working with Radiation Oncology Resources, Inc. to develop much-needed Quality Systems and training programs for radiation therapy. In the process, I have met more and more dosimetrists and dosimetry students, and am always impressed by their hunger to learn, improve, and share techniques and best practices. Dosimetrists are a highly collaborative population of colleagues as opposed to a competitive population of rivals. This is healthy.

As part of my commitment and appreciation for the dosimetry community, I proudly announce that I will be working with Dr. Scott Collins and his Dosimetry Master program at Southern Illinois University (Carbondale). I will be giving guest lectures, working with ROR to run plan quality projects (i.e. Plan Challenges devoted to the students), and most importantly I will be arming the students with “Quality Reports [EMR]” licenses throughout their education. Read more about it here or here (ROR website, longer press release) or here (Reuters).

We just finished a pilot project with the outgoing class of 2013, and in just a few weeks we were already seeing how the software can help on so many fronts – from interactive education on core principles of radiation therapy, to clinical protocols and continual improvement initiatives. We now look forward to the 2014 class, and beyond.

– Ben Nelms...

Project Icarus: Survey Results & Next Steps

Posted on

Two weeks ago, I posted a survey to help gather some information that will help me plan for Project Icarus. I sent 70 email notifications and 40 people filled out the survey, which is a pretty good response rate (thanks for that). The survey results are summarized here along with the “next steps” for Project Icarus.

Survey Summary

95% of all respondents heard about Project Icarus from the AAMD talk, either because they were there (85%) or heard from somebody who was (10%). As far as demographics of workforce, 42.5% of dosimetrists worked with three or more other planners and just 12.5% worked as the sole planner at their site. In terms of number of radiation oncologists, 42.5% work with five or more rad oncs and 40% working with just one or two.

Regarding how or why people want to be involved, a menu of possible responses was provided where people could enter multiple answers as applicable. There were four standout responses: 1) I want to use it to generate objective data regarding dose or DVH objectives that might be impossible to achieve, per patient (90%); 2) I want to be part of something new and useful in my industry (82.5%); 3) I want to connect with a network of like-minded planners with mutual interests (70%); and 4) I want to use it to help communication with my physicians (60%).

Fewer respondents (15%) were interested in publishing results or presenting at a future AAMD meeting. I believe this reflects that clinical workloads do not allow dosimetrists much time for dedicated “research” projects, though I will note that 95% of people graded their boss as either “somewhat supportive” or “very supportive” of clinically relevant research projects. So listen, I think you should remain open-minded about the topic of research, because even though publishing is certainly a lot of work and the review process requires thick skin, it is still a very effective way to contribute to the knowledge base in your industry. Here is how I see it: if you figure out something important, useful, or just cool, then get the word out....